Klamath County Sheriff Uses Chemical Warfare Against Woman

The Klamath County Health Department is too busy citing little old ladies for bring deserts to Church then reviewing my reports of their filthy disease ridden jails. Does anybody see a pattern of retaliation against targeted Americans here?

The use of chemical warfare against U.S. citizens consist of shit disturbing twerps who the government uses as informants to purposely plug the septic system so that you are up to your neck in community sewage. This is in retaliation for one of my complaints and to force women out of their homes, keep them on the streets, homeless, in a brave attempt to terminate their lives.

Not only did I land in prison on July 4th, but this July 4th I was forced to contend with a sewer flooding of feces and urine. I now live in a trailer court of white trash as a result of my suing the U.S. government, inter alia, for excessive "camping" violations). 

Pat Robertson wants Facebook 'vomit' button to press when he sees photos of gay couples. How about this one?

The sewer was backing up in my trailer, so I called the landlord. I knew that when he arrived with his snake he would lift up my pipe cap and sewer spillage would land in front of my kitchen window...So, I jumped out of my trailer and demanded that he go within 5 feet to the shit disturbing twerp next door and check out his sewage system.

Making all kinds of excuses for the punk, including his not using the septic system until his camper is full, the cap being sealed, etc, I repeatedly said for him to check the punks system. (Such a fight for women to live independently). 

I went with the landlord and as he opened the punk's cap out poured a flood of feces nonstop. The landlord must of pulled out 20 feet of wire the punk used to block the system.

The neighbors blamed me and became hostile believing it was my sewer system backed up. While it is true, when the U.S. government destroys your health, you can become ill from their ill-will treatment of you and their sick cover-ups. Trust me, they could give a rat's ass about women, only young blonds.

The next day, the shit disturbing twerp had a urinal backed up within 3 feet of my bedroom (One in many events, a  consistent pattern by the U.S. government) . Now, there are health codes to prevent these kinds of situations. However, any health code violation does not apply to me, a disenfranchised Hebrew American.

The U.S. government knows that I come from a Kosher Jewish background but to violate my religious rights does not matter to them.

Farm Tools Can Be Mistaken To Be Guns

Induced Government Paranoia To Send People Away To Mental Institutions

Send A Message To The Human Rights Campaign about spreading hatred indirectly through deliberate indifference, undisputable neglect (click here)

• Hospitalized Illegally and Maliciously (click here)

Or, this one http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1872545

What Did The American Nazi's Do To Cosma?

(1995-2013)

They systematically harassed her, made it impossible for her to earn a living, sent her to live in homelessness and ghettos, seized her possessions, enslaved her and is killing her through a lack of medical access.

Every single Jewish Holocaust story is different, and it differs from every country. Here's a small list of what Nazis did to Cosma (a Jew with a gentile name):

• Cosma was prohibited from walking into many stores, restaurants, etc. 
• Cosma has to be identified with so many alias that the U.S. Government has given her that she stumbles on a daily basis as to her true identity
• Cosma is unable to wear jewelry and was forced to give up her Star of David during one arbitrary arrest in Lassen County, California.
• Cosma has been threatened daily with unrealistic and grotesque experiments.
• Cosma has been banned completely from ALL of her professional agendas
• Cosma was not allowed to own and operate a vehicle
• Cosma has been forbidden to own any businesses
• Cosma is not allowed to own pets or run her farm and has to stay at home from 8pm till 6am and her controlled territory is within a two mile radius of her ghetto home 
• Cosma cannot look outside her front door or out her window lest she be accused of stalking someone else. However, it is okay if men whose sexual curiosity is peaked can intimidate Cosma.
• Cosma was prohibited from participating in weight lifting and other sports because "she has a history of stalking women."
• Cosma's two minor sons were "legally" abducted. One was turned into a child soldier 
• Like the Nazi's who did not want to waste one bullet on a Jew, so too, Cosma has not had one iota of justice despite her filing more than 15 years of legal pleadings and motions

When There Is No Recourse For Housing Right Violations

Kini Cosma

P.O. Box 7918

Klamath Falls, OR 97602

(541) 880-4534

In Properia Persona

INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS,

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

Kini Cosma,                                   Plaintiff,                                                   vs. SHIRLEY MUNSON DBA MUNSON, MOBILE HOME PARK, STEVE JONES, JELD-WEN, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive.                                  Defendant(s)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No.: COMPLAINT 42 U.S.C. §3604 and §3617: OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT; 42 U.S.C. § 3617; §§804, 813, 818; GOVERNMENT CODE §§12955-12956.2; INTENTIONAL AND NEGLIGENT EMOTIONAL DISTRESS

________________________________/

(1) Defendant, Munson Mobile Home Park is a private company owned and operated by Shirley Munson, aka the Shirley Munson Living Trust, at . The principal place of business is at 3711 Laverne Ave., Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603.

2. Defendant, Jeld-Wen is registered with the Oregon Secretary of State as an assumed business name (ABN) with it's principal place of business at 401 Harbor Isles Blvd. in Klamath Falls, OR 97601.
3. Defendant Steve Jones is the manager -landlord, (herein referred to as “the landlord”), of the Munson Mobile Home Park, resides at 3740 Crest Street in Klamath Falls, Oregon and is employed by Jeld-Wen.

(4) Plaintiff, Kini Cosma, is a tenant who agreed with the landlord to a long-term lease of a 50 ft x 30 ft parcel of property to use as her private residence at 3711 Laverne Avenue in Klamath Falls, Oregon.

(5) Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and therefore sues these defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this complaint to allege their true names and capacities when ascertained.

JURISDICTION

(SEE SEALED AFFIDAVIT)

I.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

DEFENDANTS, JELD-WEN, FALSELY ADVERTISED 

ATTRACTING PLAINTIFF TO ENTER INTO A LONG-TERM 

REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION WITH 

 

MUNSON MOBILE HOME PARK

(6) Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs 1-5 inclusive, herein.

(7) According to Defendant Jeld-Wen's written mission statements, logos, and other written public propaganda, they describe themselves with excessive pride and self-satisfaction declaring: “employees are to live in a fashion that inspires good works and keeps a positive influence.”

 
(8) Defendants exults of “improving neighborhoods and building better communities” and boasts that their “Core Values and Beliefs” are “to support worthy causes that have a direct, positive impact on the long-term health, well-being and future of JELD-WEN families and communities.”

(9) Defendants Jeld-Wen avow, “at the heart of the JELD-WEN Foundation is a desire and commitment to give back to working JELD-WEN families and communities, to improve the lives of those we are privileged to serve as well as others who benefit as a result...”
 
(10) Defendants claim they recognize and “value the fact that it is a rare privilege to live in a society that is as free and as prosperous as ours and believe we have a duty and responsibility to contribute to its success. We believe the best help offers long-term solutions, not just temporary bandages..."

(11) Defendant Steve Jones their employee, resides four houses within the direct vicinity of plaintiff and has not lived up to these expectations forcing plaintiff to live in unsafe, unsanitary and unhealthy conditions.

II.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

DEFENDANT STEVE JONES RETALIATED AGAINST 

PLAINTIFF FOR EXERCISING HER HOUSING RIGHTS

(12) Plaintiffs incorporates paragraphs 1-11 inclusive, herein.

(13) When plaintiff began her tenancy, a substantial and very important priority was her request for a reasonable accommodation of privacy asking permission to place a fence surrounding her area at her expense. Plaintiff also asked whether she could work on a vehicle she had. This request was also approved by Jones.

(14) Defendant Jones was aware of plaintiff being a single female tenant when applying for the tenancy. Jones was also aware that he was harboring (directly behind plaintiff) a younger male, herein described as an “individual,” with a history of being extremely loud, obnoxious, and constantly involved in scuffles and other disturbances.

(15) What began the retaliation was on November 4, 2012, before leaving, plaintiff asked the individual¹ to please not park in her area because she would be blocked in.

(16) On Friday, November 5, 2012, at approximately 8:30 a.m., plaintiff was preparing to leave her residence to help a friend at the local public library with his legal case when she noticed that the individual deliberately parked in the area plaintiff asked him not to park in. Before getting in her vehicle and driving away, plaintiff told the individual that she would be hiring someone who was to arrive that day to help with the fence; his vehicle was in the way and it would need to be moved.

(17) Around 2:30 pm – 3:30 pm, the person plaintiff hired arrived. Not only was the individual's pickup still in the way but he had chained it to the salvage and wrecked motor home sideways crossing over into plaintiff's vicinity.

(18) Plaintiff's assistant noticed a dummy chain attached and proceeded to removed it. Plaintiff then towed the pickup a few feet when she saw a Klamath County Sheriff driving by. Waving him down, the officer proceeded to observe and ask questions about the property and pickup. He indicated to plaintiff to do whatever she felt was necessary.

(19) According to ORS §98.810 (2), an unauthorized parking of a vehicle on proscribed property is prohibited without the permission of the owner. Specifically, not to leave or park any vehicle on the proscribed property whether or not there is a sign prohibiting or restricting parking on the proscribed property. Further, if a vehicle has been left or parked in violation of ORS 98.810, just and reasonable charges can be requested.

(20) During the course of towing the individual's pickup, plaintiff sustained damages to her vehicle amounting to $595 to $600 (See estimates).

(21) The landlord failed to make an individualized assessment when plaintiff went to discuss the damage of her vehicle. Plaintiff contends the landlord needs to be held responsible for not disclosing to plaintiff that he harbored a loud, obnoxious, and hostile tenant, unable to control his tenant's actions by not setting boundaries of the properties he manages. The landlord contended that the individual should be held responsible in “small claims court”. As a result, plaintiff refused to pay one months rent.

(22) The landlord continued to bill plaintiff for the lapse in rent payments of $185 (EXHIBIT A) while using the individual to spew garbage all over the property (EXHIBIT B) and to retaliate², intimidate and harass plaintiff. The landlord refused to lay boundaries so that this individual would directly harass plaintiff in the proximity of plaintiffs' residence thereby increasing the damage's plaintiff complains herein.

(23) Defendants took negative actions and omitted actions against plaintiff; interfering with those concerned³ about plaintiff and her exercising the enjoyment of her fair housing rights; Retaliatory conduct- a pattern showing harassment, threatening significant physical or emotional harm through the use of derogatory or inappropriate names, insults, verbal assaults, profanity, or ridicule, coercion, punishment, implied threats, intimidation, humiliation, mental cruelty.

III.

DEFENDANTS VIOLATED PLAINTIFF'S RIGHTS TO 

 

RETAIN FAIR HOUSING BASED ON GENDER AND 

 

SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION

(24) Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs 1-23 inclusive, herein.

(25) The landlord discriminated against plaintiff because she opposed acts, policies, and practices made unlawful by this part or in the past. He allowed the individual to harass and intimidate plaintiff in an effort to prevent her from the use of her accommodations by allowing him to violate her privacy.

(26) Defendants conduct is not equal to that afforded to other tenants who reside at the Munson Mobile Home Park. This denial of equal opportunities enjoyed by other tenants has been intentionally and unreasonably done for the purpose of causing plaintiff to suffer humiliation, mental anguish, and emotional and physical distress interfering with and substantially impairing the enjoyment and use of the premises others are entitled to.

(27) As a proximate result of the nature and cost of these actions, furthering the undisputed historical facts of unresolved probable cause, outright intentional exclusion, malicious prosecutions constituting a deprivation of liberty without due process of law conducted with the intent to deprive a plaintiff of equal protection of the laws or is otherwise intended to subject her to a denial of constitutional rights by the United States for over 15 years, plaintiffs prays that this court will grant household living arrangements away from tortious injuries; damages that are usually considered to go beyond traditional pain and suffering or mental anguish and for this individual’s inability to pursue a proper residential household as demonstrated; that defendants have been motivated by a discriminatory purpose, selected or reaffirmed by a particular course of action at least in part because of, not merely in spite of, its adverse effects upon an identifiable group or the anti-retaliation provision set forth.

IV.

CONCLUSION

(28) WHEREFORE, plaintiff, pursuant to Section 810(g)(2)(a) of the Act, hereby charges defendants with engaging in discriminatory housing practices, in violation of Section 804 and 818 of the Act [42 U.S.C. Sections 3604 and 3617], and prays that an order be issued that:

(29) 1. Declares that the discriminatory housing practices of defendants, as set forth above, violate the Fair Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-19;

(30) 2. Enjoins defendants, his agents, employees and successors, and all other persons in active concert or participation with him, from harassing, retaliating, and discriminating against plaintiff because of her gender, sexual orientation, and disability in any aspect of the rental;

(31) 3. Award such damages as willfully to compensate plaintiff for her economic loss, inconvenience, physical and emotional distress and loss of an important housing opportunity, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3612(g)(3), and any other damages to which plaintiff is legally entitled;

(32) 4. Award a maximum civil penalty of $11,000 for each discriminatory housing practice found against defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3612(g)(3); and,

(33) 5. Award such additional relief as may be appropriate under the All Writs Act of 28 USC 1651; S.47, the Violence Against Women Act of 2013; Full Faith And Credit Provision and 42 U.S.C. § 3612(g)(3) of the Act because the landlord knew or should have known about the conditions posing an imminent and serious threat to the health or safety of the occupants and must be liable for money damages of either two months' rent or up to twice the damages the tenant sustained as a result of the violation, whichever is greater.

(34) Award any other damages to which plaintiff is legally entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

Signed: Dated:

Printed: Kini Cosma, Plaintiff

P.O. Box 7918

Klamath Falls, OR 97602

(541) 880-4534

Inpropria Persona

VERIFICATION

I, Kini Cosma, am a plaintiff in the above-entitled action. I have read the foregoing and know the contents thereof. The same is true of my own knowledge, except as to those matters which are therein alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters, I believe to be true.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed at Klamath Falls, Oregon.

Signed: ________ Dated: __________________________

Affidavit Under Seal

(1) The impact on my everyday life in the United States under The Human Rights Act and the right to respect for privacy and guaranteeing core components of the human rights framework for economic and social rights of women's rights including access to education, health and violence against women under Article 8 in the pervasive culture of impunity in both with regard to past abuses remain an overall decline in the policy and practice of democratic and human rights standards.

(2) It remains an overall decline relating to my children in the pervasive culture of impunity with regard to past abuses and those who are interested in the added value of human rights.

FUTILE EFFORTS TO ACCESS COURTS AND JURISDICTION UPDATE

STATUS OF STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS 

 

California Local, State, and Federal Cases:

DISMISSED

DISMISSED

DISMISSED 

DISMISSED

DISMISSED

Appeal Fee paid 12/7/99 CV-F-97-5994-OWW: $105.00

DISMISSED

DISMISSED 

DISMISSED

DISMISSED 

DISMISSED

COLLATERAL DAMAGES: Undetermined Amount

Oregon Local, State, and Federal Cases:

Oregon State Circuit Court, 13^th Judicial District, Klamath 

County

Judges Roxanne Osborne 

Richard Rambo 

CASE NO.:0803782CV DISMISSED

CASE NO.:0803718CV DISMISSED

CASE NO.:0804232CV DISMISSED

Cameron Wogan CASE NO.:09-1352 DISMISSED

CASE NO.:11-464CR DISMISSED

COLLATERAL DAMAGES: Undetermined Amount

COUNTY OF MARION CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF 

OREGON

CASE NO.: NONE ASSIGNED DISMISSED

Oregon Court of Appeals 

 

CASE NO.: A149568 DISMISSED

CASE NO.: A145734 DISMISSED

 

Oregon Supreme Court 

 

CASE NO.: 8058661

Oregon Federal District Court:

CASE NO.: 10CV3062-CL DISMISSED

CASE NO.: 11-3062-CL DISMISSED

CASE NO.: 1:12-cv-01767-CL DISMISSED

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:

CASE NO.: 98-16415

CASE NO.: 98-16672

CASE NO.: 98-16673

CASE NO.: 08-16561 DISMISSED

CASE NO.: 11-35438 DISMISSED

COLLATERAL DAMAGES: Undetermined Amount

TIME FRAME IN CURRENT CASE

September 2012: I complained to landlord about the individual and his noise all night long and about the water spicket he burst all over my carport I was constructing.

September 22-23 2012: Complained to police about the individual's drug addict friends glaring at me. One came to my door twice with a ruse. Loitering guests

November 4, 2012: Cosma asked individual to please not park in her area because she would be blocked in.

November 5, 2012, at approximately 8:30 a.m.: Individual deliberately parked in the area not permitted to park in. Around 2:30 pm – 3:30 pm, the person plaintiff hired arrived and individual's vehicle was still in the way. The individual deliberately chained his pickup to the salvage and wrecked motor home. I waved down Klamath County Sheriff Webber to report that the individual's truck was deliberately chained to his RV when parked in my area.

February 21, 2013: Landlord ordered that individual and Steve's son-in-law, Brandon Love, tear down an old wrecked RV no longer in operation. In the process of this job, they spewed wood, nails, other debris and metal material all over the round about where tenants drive through.

February 25, 2013: I needed to drive my van over to feed my horses others are entitled to enjoy but me. Fearing I would be unable to repark my vehicle when returning, I called the police for them to witness the debris spewed in the driveway. Nails and other material would inflict further damage to my vehicle. The individual knows I do not have reverse in my van and he targets this vulnerability to harass me (The reverse kick down band has disengaged). Regardless, if he remembers or not. All of us use the driveway for a turn around.

March 8, 2013: Individual put his sleeping bag on my fence line. I asked him to remove it.

March 9, 2013: Individual put a phallic looking material in the driveway. Called the police. Reported this to landlord.

March 14, 2013: Individual tried to assault me with his truck. AGAIN contacted the police. I told the police that I was told he did not have a valid driver's license, insurance, or registration. The police told me they would be aware for his truck and enforce vehicle laws. To date, the individual drives it around, mostly at night. Very noisy like no muffler.

Proof of Services

I, Kini Cosma, declare I am a resident of the County of Klamath, State of Oregon. I am

a competent person 18 years of age or older. I AM A PARTY to or attorney in this proceeding. I certify that the person, firm, or corporation served is the identical one named in this action.

On the day of __________________________, 20________ , I personally deposited a true copy of the:

at the United States Postal Service, via first class mail, in a sealed envelope, postage

prepaid, addressed to the party (Defendant(s)-Respondent(s) to be served, at the party’s business address listed:

JELD-WEN Foundation and Executive Director: Robert Kingzett Klamath Falls Office: 3250 Lakeport Boulevard Klamath Falls, Oregon 97601 Phone: (541) 880-2185

Jeld-Wen Inc 1500 SW 1st Ave Ste 1100 Portland OR 97201

Jeld-Wen Foundation 3737 Lakeport Blvd Klamath Falls (541) 882-3451

1 The police later refused to provide this individual's name indicating it was “private”

2 Retaliation: ORS § 90.385

3This uninhabitable property is so disgustingly filthy, plaintiff's friends won't come by to check up on her

The Toilet City Ghetto-A Jew May Not Look Outside

I really hate to admit this, but I believe San Francisco is cleaner than our Toilet City. Learn about the tortured explanations and ridiculous rules that prove just how much more I am being forced to live under Nuremberg Laws in the State of Oregon. All water is publicly owned, therefore, if you want to store any of it - apparently no matter where it originally comes from - you have to obtain a permit from state water gatekeepers.  Learn more: Oregon man convicted of collecting rainwater on his own property surrenders and begins serving 30-day jail sentence

These kinds of cases always remind me of the Bible verse in Luke 16:24-25 "So he called to him, 'Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.' "But Abraham replied, 'Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony."

I know lots of people who own rainwater collection devices. However, since those people are my gatekeepers, they don't count when it comes to penalties, fines, and convictions!

WHAT IS UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION?

A landlord cannot refuse to rent to a tenant, or engage in any other type of discrimination on the basis of group characteristics specified by law that are not closely related to the landlord’s business needs.  

Arbitrary discrimination on the basis of any personal characteristic such as those listed are also is prohibited.

The California legislature has declared that the opportunity to seek, obtain and hold housing without unlawful discrimination is a civil right. However, in Klamath Falls, Oregon, there is no civil right to hold housing without discrimination even though the law says there is.

Under California’s Fair employment and housing Act and unruh Civil Rights Act, it is unlawful for a landlord, managing agent, real estate broker, or salesperson to discriminate against a person or harass a person because of the person’s race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, childbirth or medical conditions related to them, as well as gender and perception of gender), sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income.  Again, in Klamath Falls, Oregon, this would not apply either even though the law says it is.

Unlawful housing discrimination can take a variety of forms:

• Providing inferior housing terms, conditions, privileges, facilities, or services.
•  Harassing a person in connection with housing accommodations.
• Providing segregated or separated housing accommodations. 
• Refusing to permit a person with a disability, at the person with a disability’s own expense, to make reasonable modifications to a rental unit that are necessary to allow the person with a disability “full enjoyment of the premises.”

You can ask a court to grant you:

• An injunction prohibiting the unlawful practice.
• Access to housing that the landlord denied you.
• Damages for emotional distress. 
• Civil penalties or punitive damages.
• Attorney’s fees

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) enforces the federal fair housing law, which prohibits discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion, national origin, familial status, and handicap (disability).  However, in my experience, DON'T COUNT ON IT!
 
To contact HUD so they can run you around, look in the white pages of the phone book under United States Government Offices , or go to www.hud.gov
 
Resolving housing discrimination problems is a problem if you are a victim of housing discrimination (for example, if a landlord refuses to rent to you because of your race or national origin), you may have several legal remedies, including:

• Recovery of out-of-pocket losses.
• An injunction prohibiting the unlawful practice. 
• Access to housing that the landlord denied you.
• Damages for emotional distress. 
• Civil penalties or punitive damages. 
• Attorney’s fees. 
• Alterations to accommodate a tenant with a disability

A landlord must allow a tenant with a disability to make reasonable modifications to the rental unit to the extent necessary to allow the tenant “full enjoyment of the premises.”

See also Andrews v. Mobile Aire Estates (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 578 [22 Cal.Rptr.3d 832]. A typical legal description of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is that neither party will do anything that will injure the right of the other party to receive the benefits of the agreement.

See the Andrews decision for a discussion of the closely related implied covenant of quiet enjoyment.
 
In order for a tenant to win such a lawsuit against the landlord, all of the following conditions must be met:

• The rental unit has a serious habitability defect. That is, the rental unit contains a lead hazard that endangers the occupants or the public; or substantially lacks any when a nuisance endangers the health, life, safety, property, or welfare of the occupants or the public; 
• Inadequate sanitation, or premises

Demolition of a Dwelling 

You would think the proper thing to do is for the owner of a dwelling is to give written notice to current or new tenants before applying for a permit to demolish the dwelling.  However, the landlord can make your life a miserable mess without the courtesy of talking with tenants if he is an asshole, like in my case.

The notice must include the earliest approximate dates that the owner expects the demolition to occur and the tenancy to end.

Even though California law protects a tenant from retaliation by the landlord because the tenant has lawfully exercised a tenant right, the landlord can and will be malicious if they want.

Oregon follows California on many of it's civil duties, so expect a most unpleasant experience when they flout the laws of chaos in your face to supercede the leading state.

California law also makes it unlawful for a landlord to attempt to influence a tenant to move by doing any of the following:

• Engaging in conduct that constitutes theft or extortion.
• Using threats, force, or menacing conduct that interferes with the tenant’s quiet enjoyment of the rental unit. (the conduct must be of a nature that would create the fear of harm in a reasonable person.)

 Because the laws vary according to how a judge wakes up in the morning, be prepared to brown nose. Here is an image that you can practice on:

Just ignore these pop ups at the Jody Arias trial on http://abcnews.go.com. You can always store your toilet water in her c**t. No permit is needed for that.

(I was just wondering. Is this suppose to turn me on?  I can smell the strange flesh of her filthy ass from my laptop.)

Kini's rental unit has a serious habitability defect on the premises that endangers the occupants or the public; or substantially lacks hygiene when a nuisance endangers the health, life, safety, property, or welfare of the occupants or the public.

However, the Courts have discriminated against Kini (because she has an odd name) and inadequate sanitation does not matter to the Judges in state and federal courts. As a result, she must suffer the lowest forms of inadequate medical care.

Filthy Stinking Mattress Within 7 ft Of My Kitchen. Although we do not have rats yet. Mice love to burrow in mattresses harboring whatever diseases they like to carry.

When you open the door in the morning, say, "Good morning, filth!' because the tenants are unpredictive and any sight can be an odd sight.

Even though harassment and intimidation should not be allowed to influence you to vacate your home, in Oregon the police will gladly accommodate the complainer to the nearest jail and the Judges in Klamath Falls will accommodate you to the nearest mental institution because you exercised your civil rights to peacable and quiet enjoyment of the premises you are leasing. Lunatics are welcome to also enjoy your premises so if you are thinking about having a home business....

As you can see the people in Klamath Falls, Oregon, are just plain dirty. They need a Tsuami of Mexicans to invade their territory.